Posted: 24 May 2010 02:56 PM PDT

The No More Heroes series has officially ended with its second installment, according to Suda 51, its creator. In a recent interview with GoNintendo, Goichi Suda, the CEO of Grasshopper Manufacture, declared that there were no plans for another No More Heroes game, though this might not be the end of the franchise's main character, Travis Touchdown.

Asked if there was a large storyline ahead for No More Heroes, Suda 51 replied, "Unfortunately, the story for Travis alone is completed in No More Heroes 2. I am very curious about his life after this; however, we have no plan for No More Heroes 3." About a possible port for the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3, Suda said that it was not his decision whether to port the game or not, but that he would prefer the game remained a Nintendo exclusive.

He continued to say that he would like to work on a new Killer7 release, as that was an important game to him. Killer 7 is an action-adventure title for the GameCube and the PlayStation 2 that was launched in 2005 to a mixed critical reception. The gameplay was a peculiar blend of an on rails first-person shooter and puzzle solving that soon became a cult classic for many Western gamers.

Goichi Suda, aka Suda 51, is the visionary CEO of developer Grasshopper Manufacture, the studio behind the critically acclaimed Nintendo Wii series No More Heroes. The second and last installment, No More Heroes 2: Desperate Struggle, is set to appear in Europe on the 28th of May 2010. It has already launched in North America and a release in Japan is yet to be announced. The main character, Travis Touchdown, is an assassin that wants to rise through the ranks of the United Assassins Association.

Five Filters featured article: The Art of Looking Prime Ministerial - The 2010 UK General Election. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction.

Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains winner revealed - abc40

Posted: 24 May 2010 11:32 PM PDT

By Kate Stanhope,

Spoiler Alert: The following reveals the winner of Sunday night's Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains finale.

Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains came down to the final five finalists in competition for the Sole Survivor title and the $1 million prize.

After 37 days and the return of 20 of the game's most memorable players, it was four against one as lone remaining Hero Colby Donaldson (The Australian Outback) battled four Villains: Jerri Manthey (The Australian Outback), Sandra Diaz-Twine (Pearl Islands), Parvati Shallow ( Cook Islands) and Russell Hantz ( Samoa).

Check out photos from Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains

Colby was arguably one of the series' original heroes after his honorable game play in Season 2. Unfortunately, almost ten years after his rise to reality TV fame, Colby proved a lackluster physical competitor, and ultimately one of the biggest surprises of the season. After his poor performances in challenges throughout the season, Colby needed an immunity challenge win to stay in the game against the Villains' strong alliance.

Given those facts, it was perhaps unsurprising that Colby was the first eliminated. Despite his best efforts to sway Russell, only Villains remained in the running for the $1 million prize.

Survivor's Rupert: "The Heroes had no hope"

The final physical challenge, in which the players were forced to make their way through a maze blindfolded, was based on luck rather than will and determination. Russell beat Parvati and Jerri by a hair to claim a spot on his second final tribal council.

Sandra convinced Russell to take her to the final three with the argument that the jury would never vote for her since she already won the million dollars. The past winners argument is a strong one — who really wants to give someone else another million bucks? — and made Parvati a logical choice for the final three as well. But at camp, Russell sounded intent on taking Jerri with him to the end.

At the penultimate tribal council, Parvati seemed truly nervous she would fall short of the final council, despite her close (but complicated) alliance with Russell. But Russell surprised viewers and took Parvati to the end, pitting two previous winners against one of Survivor's most notorious villains.

At the final tribal council in front of the jury (consisting of five Heroes and five Villains), Russell, Parvati and Sandra each made similar arguments that they played the best game. Sandra said she had no alliances to rely on and was truly a sole survivor. Russell acknowledged his betrayals, but also argued he made it to the end solely on his big game and not on luck (pretty much his argument last season). Finally, Parvati said she was the best because of her physical prowess and because she was able to use Russell as her "pet" from Day One.

Even though he's never won the prize, most of the jury was still out for Russell's blood, especially since he played a role in most of their exits. The jury members argued Parvati was a strong player, but Candice and Rupert, among others, condemned her for her alliance with Russell. In the eyes of the jury, Sandra sometimes did not give 100 percent in the challenges, but proved herself to be very loyal, and, as Candice said, more of a Hero than most of this season's contestants.

And so the winner of Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains is: Sandra! She beat out runner-up Parvati and Russell to become the first person to ever win twice.

However, Russell didn't walk away empty handed. For the second season in a row, he won the fan vote for Sprint Player of the Season and $100,000, defeating Rupert Boneham.

Finally, Jeff Probst announced that Season 21 of Survivor will take place in Nicaragua.

Do you think the right person won?

Comment on this article at TVGuide.com >

Related Articles on TVGuide.com

Other Links From TVGuide.com